Saturday 26 May 2007

Muhammad Haque reporting on the constitutional law framework for the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme against Crossrail hole Bill

Hypertext links may not be available from this edition of AADHIKAROnline being published on this [blogger.com] web site

Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 Area Campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill and the campaign in general for the social, economic, environmental and democratic and constitutional and legal defence of the East End of London

Editor©Muhammad Haque
AADHIKARonline

AADHIKARonline Editor’s note – summarised version viewable via the web page link at

http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html

ADHIKARonline 8th Edn of the day 1840 Hrs GMT Saturday 26.05.2007



Khoodeelaar! legal action programme – The Muhammad Haque daily [constitutional law] commentary [Part 2 of the day, Saturday 26 May 2007]

What is the essence of a country’s constitution? IN one simple sentence - : so that those who seek and occupy positions of power do as they promise to do and are seen to be doing what they should do and can be held to account for what they fail or refuse to do.
This is also extrapolated to various lower reaches of the organisation called the state.
But the main test is by reference to the conduct of what is called the peoples’ parliament.
Parliament defined as the democratic expression of the peoples’ legitimate and honestly held expectations!
How wrong that institutionally established mental expectation – and state marketing device is - is seen whenever the peoples’ rights are subjected to violations by the occupants of the offices in the state!
The case is most comprehensively exhibited in the promotion through the UK parliament of the Crossrail Bill.
The legal action programme that I have devised for the Khoodeelaar! movement to expose and to stop that crassly conceived ‘CrossRail hole’ Bill, has been based on the examination of the evidence as contained in the literally millions of words of CrossRail hole-promoting lies that have been produced by its promoters, agents, touts over the past years.
Along side the community-based political and educational campaign to expose the CrossRail hole plot, Khoodeelaar! has been publishing the key points for the past 41 months that on the facts, make up the unconstitutionality, the illegality of the entire Crossrail hole scheme.

The fraudulence the immorality of the liars has been covered by the platforms that they have been allowed to use. Like their being MPs. Like their being councillors. Like their being ‘academics’.

Whatever happened to the ‘solemn petitioners’ from addresses as shown to be in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area during September 2005 to June 2006 before the ‘Crossrail Bill’ select committee of MPs? Are they taking any ‘legal’ action against the ‘recommendations’ of the Committee?

So far as is known, none of them is taking any legal actions in any UK court against the CrossRail hole Bill.

Why?

Because they are, all of them, ‘loyal subjects’ prepared to worship at the alter of the poodles that Big Business set up [in the UK House of Commons] as 'the Crossrail Bill select committee' by using its [Big Business] influence over the Blairing regime .
To those who ‘appeared before the MPs’ committee, the appearance was the EVENT!

They scarcely showed any ability to understand that the exercise was a charade, that no changes could be forced to be made to the Crossrail Bill by playing the role that the state has set for the ‘subject people’ to play on these occasions.

To anyone in command of their faculties in the ordinary world and presented with a claim by any of these petitioners that they [these petitioners] were taking part in some important act of political representation, the question must arise: what was the point of all those petitions if the petitioners do not wish to challenge the ‘recommendations’ [as published in July 2006] that are evidently against the claims and ‘preferences’ the petitioners concerned were making as they ‘presented’ their loyal petitions in June 2006?
None of the ‘formally listed’ petitioners has made any statement since June 2006. Not in any legally or constitutionally relevant or significant way.
Why not?

Because the petitioners were not, ever, really opposed to the attacks via Crossrail that were plotted against the community. The main importance that these petitioners attached in their exercise was not to the defence of the community so much as to the creation of a reference about themselves as persons who went and appeared before a committee of MPs!!!
And the MPs – the poodles who make up the CrossRail hole Bill select committee, more or less knew this.
That is why they treated most of the petitioners with the manifest contempt that they did do.
That the poodles ceased to be poodles and almost became intelligent for a few minutes was noticeable whenever any of the poodles became aware of the fact that they were being addressed by certain ‘subjects’ from addresses in London E1 area.
Whenever that occurred to the poodles, the poodles came to life and started shouting at the petitioners, or at those of the petitioners who showed any even the slightest temerity to suggest that the CRASSrail Bill had been flawed in any way.
[To be continued]

Khoodeelaar! legal action programme – The Muhammad Haque daily [constitutional law] commentary - Part 1

0840 Hrs GMT London Saturday 26 May 2007

As I have said before, the Khoodeelaar! movement against the Crossrail hole Bill attacks on the East End of London will test the relevance of the claim that ‘English law’ and or the ‘UK domestic law’ has all the remedies that a free and civilised society should afford its ‘citizens’.
The process of finding out just how true that assertion is has just begun. The most recently retired [but not intellectually inactive] ‘Lord Chief Justice’ of England is one of those who are on the record as having said this. That ‘English law’ without including the ECHR and its implications, has had in it the remedies and the protection for the ‘citizen’ that the ‘European law’ provides. The claim has been most elaborately made over the past few years in several opinions and judgements issued by the judicial form of the UK House of Lords [the UK’s Supreme Court or the nearest to a UK Supreme Court in comparison with the highest courts in any ‘sovereign’ country]. The ‘debate’ staged in the UK in the run up to the state’s formal incorporation of the so-called human rights conventions exposed the contradictions of the so-called British constitution. It also showed up as unsubstantiated the [‘judicial’ or, rather, the ‘judiciary’s’] assertion that the UK’s domestic legal system had sufficient protections for the ordinary ‘citizen’. What the incorporated law provides for is not only not the totally provisions that exist under the main ECHR and its world version as contained within the United Nations Organisation.

The UK’s legislation is, typically tokenistic and in the long run dishonest.

No wonder that some of the alleged backers of the statute['The Human Rights Act 1998'] are now among the fiercest of its critics, no! condemners!. One of those being the so-called Home Secretary John Reid.
How long it will take before the series of Khoodeelaar! legal actions is concluded is not possible to say at this stage. But it will take a significant length of time before any definitive statement can be made by way of the ‘final outcome’.
The ECHR is the main framework for the initial court application and attendant actions that Khoodeelaar! has now filed in the London High Court to stop the Crossrail hole Bill attacks on the community in the East End of London

Within that framework fall the UK’s domestic legislation, specially the Human Rights Act 1998.
Also included are the UK legislations listed below
The Freedom of Information Act
The Race Relations Act 1976
The Race Relations [Amendments] Act 2000

[To be continued]


Khoodeelaar! Action against Crossrail hole Bill –KHOODEELAAR! PHOTO NEWS

To view the following web pages, visit


http://uk.geocities.com/aadhikarnews/today.html


1. Street action in Brick Lane on Thursday 24 May 2007
2. Hanbury Street, the site of the threatened Crossrail hole, was the location of the latest Khoodeelaar! opposition to the plot. In this Khoodeelaar! picture, Hanbury Street business people joined local residents [Thursday 24 May 2007] in showing support to the Khoodeelaar! legal action programme to stop the Crossrail hole